You are going to get married (or re-married). You have minor children (or no children).  You own a business.  You own a house.  You have substantial net worth.   Since you already own your own house and business before the marriage, as you understand it, in the off-chance it does not work out you will be okay financially.  Not exactly?   

While it is true that assets that are acquired prior to marriage, or that are acquired through a gift or inheritance are non-marital property – during the marriage they don’t always remain so. If the business you are operating continues to grow through the marriage, the appreciation in the value of that business may become marital property.  Many state have laws that say that active efforts of the owner spouse during the marriage can result in a non-marital assets becoming a marital asset.  As a result, that growth that your business has experienced becomes marital property as well. It does not mean that the entire business becomes marital property, but some portion of it is jointly owned by you and your new spouse which means that if things do not work out – your new spouse is going to have his or her share of that business coming to them. This can create significant problems when it comes time to divide up the marital estate. It may be that most of your assets are tied up in that business and it may then become difficult to buy your new spouse out of it.

During the marriage, chances are that for one reason or another, you will refinance your homes.  You will either take money out of the home or deposit it into a bank account shared with your spouse or for credit purposes (or marital pressure) add your spouse to the house title.  All of these can convert your premarital home into a marital asset.  Indeed, many state laws say that if a house (regardless if it was purchased prior to the marriage) is jointly titled at the time of a divorce, that house will be considered marital property.  So if you own your own house before getting married, you want to make sure you are protected. 

Monies in savings or investment accounts can also turn marital.  If it is passively invested, then in theory there is no issue — you put no effort into causing it to increase in value after marriage, and provided that you never put it into a jointly-titled account, or transferred it to an account opened after marriage it will be safe. The problem is that in real life things don’t usually work this way. Inevitably, some effort may go into managing it or at some point money will be moved from one account to another. And in the course of a marriage that lasts many years, things may come up that require the use of funds for a joint purpose that came from a separate property source and now require extensive accounting to trace back to that source

There is one way to avoid these problems- sign a Prenuptial Agreement.  A Prenuptial Agreement or “Prenup” for short, can ensure that what is intended to remain separate does. With a Prenup you can decided how assets are divided between you and your spouse and how much (if any) monetary support is exchanged between the two you.  In essence, you and your spouse get to pre-determine the outcome of your divorce instead of a judge.  There are some things that a Pre-nup cannot pre-determine- mainly custody of children and child support.  But a seasoned divorce lawyer can help navigate this area of the law with some guidelines and procedures.  Prenup also has some marital benefits as it forces the couple to discuss what they are going to do with their finances. It sets the stage for the marriage.  It educates both parties about the other’s financial situation.

As unpleasant as the subject matter may be, in truth there are reasons to bring the subject up that may make the relationship going more smoothly, and offer the asset protection that either or both spouses are looking for.   So who signs a Prenup?

Generally, there are three (3) instances that a Prenup is signed.  The most common instance is a second marriage.  The second is when one spouse has substantial assets to protect (such as a business or family inheritance).  The third is the executive spouse. 

But not all PreNups are rock solid.  Most Courts have accepted Prenups when a) there is full financial disclosure (meaning both sides have provided accurate and complete financial picture of the their assets) b) the agreement is not unconscionable (a complicated legal concept but which in essence means the terms are fair) and c) both sides had independent legal counsel (each spouse had their own attorneys-or opportunity to obtain his or her attorney- and had ample time to discuss the terms with them).  If you are going to sign a Prenup make sure that it is done correctly and it follow the law.  Do your homework.  Meet with a competent and trusted legal advisor well in advance of your wedding.  Talk to your spouse and make sure that you are completely transparent.  It is always better (and many times cheaper) to be safe than sorry. 

 

If you are looking for a trusted divorce attorney, contact me directly at 240.399.7892 or by email at rgolesorkhi@jgllaw.com

JGL’s Jay Holland has had a busy week with reporters. Three of them looked to him for quotes in the span of seven days! Here’s the latest article from Law360 on recent trans-rights rulings. Click the image below. 

 

A recent issue of Bloomberg Law weighed in on a recent federal court decision. Click below for the full details. 

 

JGL’s Jay Holland gave the publication some info on transgender issues making their way through the courts. Full article below. 

 

Our attorney Jay Holland made it into a recent article from The Hill. Click below for the full story.

 

The new collective bargaining agreement between Baltimore and its police is in the news. JGL’s Timothy Maloney weighs in here: 

 

Why the future of police trial boards in Baltimore is not in a judge’s hands

JGL was well-represented at the Prince George’s County Economic Development Corporation’s Capitol Access Event! Paul Herrmann, JGL’s director of marketing, is pictured below with PGEDC President Jim Coleman, MD Secretary of Commerce Mike Gill as well as several PG business owners and elected officials.  

 

Our Jay Holland was quoted twice in the news media last week on Trump’s travel ban. Check out both stories in the links below.

Trump officials scramble after travel ban defeat

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/02/see-you-in-court-trumps-travel-ban-faces-legal-challenges-in-courts-across-the-us/

Check out a new article in The MD Daily record about Brian’s new LinkedIn group focused on social justice. Click below for the link.

 

 

 

GREENBELT, MD., February — , 2017 — Joseph Greenwald & Laake P.A. is pleased to announce that Darin Rumer has been elected as an Income Partner and Matthew Focht has been elected as a Senior Counsel.

“At Joseph Greenwald & Laake, we take an intergenerational view of our talent and through that process we are thrilled to elevate Darin and Matt,” said Burt Kahn, Managing Director. “We are delighted that we have such a fine contingent of younger lawyers, and we want to reward the excellent work they have done in serving our clients.”

Darin Rumer is a member of the Firm’s Family Law Group, where he regularly advises clients on a variety of family law matters, including child custody and divorce, separation agreements, child support and alimony issues, property distribution issues, and domestic violence. Darin received his B.A. in 1997 from Clemson University, and his J.D. in 2000 from Regent University School of Law.

Matthew Focht is a member of the Firm’s Personal Injury Group and handles all aspects of civil litigation at the state and federal level in Maryland and the District of Columbia with an emphasis on plaintiff’s-side personal injury cases.  He is a 1995 graduate of Loyola College in Maryland. He earned his law degree in 2001 from the Catholic University of America, Columbus School o

About Joseph Greenwald & Laake

For more than 40 years, Joseph Greenwald & Laake has worked with individuals and businesses in  Maryland, the District of Columbia and Virginia taking on the most complex of legal issues with sophisticated counsel and a personal touch. JGL serves clients in virtually all areas of the law.

Contact:

 

Paul Herrmann

pherrmann@jgllaw.com

301-477-2500

On Tuesday, February 7, 2017, at noon, shareholder David Bulitt will be the featured speaker at a luncheon meeting of the Bar Association of Frederick County, Md. The event will take place at the Delaplaine Arts Center, 40 South Carroll Street in Frederick.
 
David will discuss the balance that he has aimed for between practicing law as a divorce lawyer, being a father of four daughters, and being a novelist, and why he decided to kick off a writing career at age 50.
 
David will speak about his new novel, BECAUSE I HAD TO, which was published in late January, 2017 and has already received dozens of five star reviews from readers and reviewers alike. Alternatively told from the perspectives of a 23 year old woman and an over 50 divorce lawyer, the novel draws heavily on David’s 30 years of experience raising children, one of them with severe mental health issues, as well as his representing clients in the area of family law. David’s first novel, CARD GAME, was published in 2015.

There have been countless articles this year about the efforts of President Donald Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress to end Obamacare and replace it with some other health insurance program. But the Washington Post reported at the end of 2016 that the GOP has another, much less publicized, health “reform” in mind that would harm victims of medical negligence by significantly cutting back medical malpractice awards nationwide.
 
This plan to limit malpractice damage awards doesn’t help patients or result in safer outcomes – just the contrary. If passed, it would take legal tools out of the hands of victims of medical negligence, with no benefit to the public (other than Heath Care Providers). Those who care protecting the public from medical mistakes need to follow this issue very closely, since to this point it has escaped almost all public notice. The public needs to stand ready to expose these proposals for what they are.
 
According to the Post’s December 30, 2016, article, GOP leaders, including Health and Human Services Secretary-designate Tom Price, want to “make it easier for doctors to defend themselves in malpractice cases and raise the burden of proof on patients claiming to have been injured. Most Republicans also back sharp limits on damage awards, often citing California’s landmark law capping noneconomic damages at $250,000 as a national model.”
 
The article points out that Price, an orthopedic surgeon who has practiced in the Atlanta area for more than 20 years, is a longtime supporter of “lawsuit abuse reform” as a way of reducing the nation’s health spending.
 
In fact, on January 4, 2017, the House Republican Study Committee, a caucus of conservative GOP House members, introduced an Obamacare replacement proposal that would, among many other things, make it harder for patients to sue their doctors for medical negligence.
 
However, as the Post article points out, the nation is not in the midst of a medical malpractice crisis. Far from it, the system is working quite well. Doctors are paying less for malpractice insurance now than they did in 2001, even after adjusting for inflation. Even without any of these draconian reforms the rate of claims has dropped by half since 2003. As the saying goes, if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.
 
The “crisis” in need of a solution seems to be that doctors believe they reaping as much profit as they could with even lower premiums. It’s a power grab, pure and simple from the congress and president the medical lobby has been praying for years.
 
The Post article quotes Michelle Mello, a Stanford University law professor, as saying, “What strikes me about these current proposals is that they really represent the agenda of medical professionals, which is all about limiting liability. To take any malpractice reform seriously, it has to offer something to improve the situation of patients and lead to safer outcomes.”
 
The GOP plan does precisely the opposite  by insulating careless heath care providers from their mistakes.
Subscribe